Having started my PhD at the University of Auckland two years ago I think it's time to provide a brief overview for the Haiku community about what I am doing here. Since a complete overview would result in a pretty big post I intend to split it into multiple smaller posts. Fingers crossed that I remain motivated enough to keep writing :).
The topic of my PhD is "User Interface Customization" and covers three aspects. First, customization in the large which targets the management of multiple windows of different applications using Stack and Tile. Secondly, customization in the small. Here I take a look at how customization can be effected within an application, especially how the user can change the layout of an application at runtime, e.g. to optimize an application for his special use-cases. Finally, I'd like to take a look at how far it is possible to also let the user customize the functionality of an application, e.g. connect a button click event to a new component that plays a sound effect to emphasize the importance of the button clicked event.
Stack and Tile
Stack and Tile is now integrated into the Haiku app_server and is enabled on default. There are two main operations in Stack and Tile which are, guess what?, stacking and tiling. Stacking allows the user to stack windows on top of one another and tiling allows the tiling of windows beside each other. To do this, just press the Windows key while dragging a window:
a) by the tab onto another window tab to stack them or
b) beside another window to tile them. In this way it's possible to create complex groups of stacked and tiled windows.
The main purpose of Stack and Tile is to make window management easier and working with multiple windows more efficient. When using multiple windows on the same desktop the user frequently runs into the problem that windows occlude each other. To make the occluded parts visible the user has to move other windows aside or bring the occluded window to the front. All these operations can result in more occlusion of other windows. This problem can makes window management quite tedious. Another problem arises when working on multiple tasks in parallel. For example, if one task is a programming task and involves multiple editor windows and a terminal, and another task uses a browser and a mail application, while a third task has a word processor and tracker window with related documents. Switching from one task to another could make it necessary to activate all windows of a task. This can be done by bringing the windows of a task to the front or moving unrelated windows aside. The more windows which belong to a certain task, the more window operations are needed to bring all windows of that task to the front thus slowing down task switching.
Stack and Tile provides a solution to these problems. Windows in a Stack and Tile group are not occluded at all if they are tiled, and windows are completely occluded if they are stacked. This solves the first problem that windows are fully or partially occluded. Tiled windows in a Stack and Tile group are always visible and stacked windows do not occlude other windows unintentionally. Furthermore, the problem of task switching is targeted, activating one window in a Stack and Tile group brings the complete group to the front and thus switching between Stack and Tile groups is very easy.
To evaluate how Stack and Tile performs compared to the traditional window system a user evaluation has been done. During BeGeistert10 many of the attendees participated in this evaluation. Thanks again for that! The results have been very positive. The measured task completion time and task switching time have been significantly lower using Stack and Tile than under non Stack and Tile conditions. Furthermore, the setup time to create a Stack and Tile group is acceptably low and does not outweigh the time saved while using a Stack and Tile group.
There were four different groups of tasks:
1) Window switching between windows with unrelated content of the same application (e.g. a stacked group of pictures).
2) Window switching between windows with unrelated content of different applications (e.g. a stacked group of a pdf viewer, a browser and a text document).
3) Window switching between related windows (e.g. exchange data between text documents which are tiled beside each other).
4) Task switching between multi-window tasks.
In all tasks Stack and Tile was superior to the non Stack and Tile setup and on average participants were able to complete the tasks much faster. If somebody is interested in more details I'd like to publish a more detailed summary at a later point.
Future Work and Session Management
Although I have finished working on Stack and Tile as part of my PhD there are still many ideas around to improv