Development

virtualdrive hasn't been used for a long time. Should help with #12162. virtualdrive hasn't been used for a long time. Should help with #12162.

262 MB

263 MB

264 MB

* Drop lib/edit and matching bsd header * Convert Debugger to libedit build package * Should solve problems with libedit consumers not defining _BSD_SOURCE * Progress on #10267 * Drop lib/edit and matching bsd header * Convert Debugger to libedit build package * Should solve problems with libedit consumers not defining _BSD_SOURCE * Progress on #10267

* The decorator now draws the titlebar. * The titlebar is font sensitive. * The minimize button is usable. * The buttons are pressable. * Fix a redraw issue. * The decorator now draws the titlebar. * The titlebar is font sensitive. * The minimize button is usable. * The buttons are pressable. * Fix a redraw issue.

Hey Fox, Just looked at your linkedin page, awesome to see your skills here. at first when you said Georgia, I thought you were in the USA (but I figured it out) Thanks! alphaseinor ...

FWIW, I really like the current LAN icon. It's totally recognizable on first glance ...

On , Axel Dörfler wrote: Am 09/06/2015 um 18:32 schrieb Humdinger (Redacted sender humdingerb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx for DMARC): I'm not sure we need icons for protocols. It looks a bit too cramped. Next thing you know, people come up with icons for such abstracts as DNS settings and FTP and Telnet servers... :) ...

Am 09/06/2015 um 18:32 schrieb Humdinger (Redacted sender humdingerb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx for DMARC): I'm not sure we need icons for protocols. It looks a bit too cramped. Next thing you know, people come up with icons for such abstracts as DNS settings and FTP and Telnet servers... :) I wouldn't even mind icons for the servers (if there are any), but I think it's overkill (visually and everything) to have icons for the ...

On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 12:32 PM, Humdinger dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: first glance. I'm not sure we need icons for protocols. It looks a bit too cramped. Next thing you know, people come up with icons for such abstracts as DNS settings and FTP and Telnet servers... :) +1. ...

On 9 June 2015 at 18:19, Alexander von Gluck IV kallisti5@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote: one is really asymmetrical. (not that my protocol icon there is any better :-)) FWIW, I really like the current LAN icon. It's totally recognizable on first glance. I'm not sure we need icons for protocols. It looks a bit too cramped. Next thing you know, people come up with icons for such abstracts as DNS settings and FTP and Telnet servers... :) ...

Thoughts? I think we need a new wired / Ethernet icon, the existing one is really asymmetrical. (not that my protocol icon there is any better :-)) ...

On 7 June 2015 at 02:13, Rob Judd judd@xxxxxxxxxx wrote: Is it possible to cross-compile Haiku on a Haiku host? I'm running gcc2h, and want to build an x86_64 version of Haiku for my UEFI hacking with QEMU. However, doing something like ./configure --build-cross-tools x86_64 ...

Jessica Hamilton jessica.l.hamilton@... writes: Is it possible to cross-compile Haiku on a Haiku host? I'm running gcc2h, and want to build an x86_64 version of Haiku for my UEFI hacking with QEMU. However, doing something like ./configure --build-cross-tools x86_64 ../buildtools ... followed by jam -q -j4 at minimum-anyboot results in ...

Web+ bookmarks (hrev49192) and remove Haikuware and BeBits. I also edited the Welcome page accordingly and removed a tip in the email workshop of the userguide that referenced RelatedMail which was hosted on Haikuware. If anyone has that app hosted anywhere, we can re-add it. ...