[GSoC 2017 - BTRFS Write Supports] Week #4 #5
I spent last 2 weeks mainly for researching and forming an complete idea so that something will not be changed much in the future and some coding. These things are what I did in the previous 2 weeks:
I implemented a “cat” command in btrfs_shell for testing, since current fs_shell misses read file content command.
Refixed ticket #127883. This is the ticket I fixed as a proof to attend GSoC for Haiku, but it is hardcoded. I simply changed the block size to node size (the old block size is sector size), so that block_cache can cache the whole node instead of caching multiple blocks with old block size, and reverted back the old code. I misunderstood in the past that block is sector but that is not always (at least in BtrFS case). In BtrFS, metadata is in tree block (node) and file data is in extent (a continous run of sectors), so with block_cache API I can easily manipulate tree node and with file_cache API for read/write files. I had a hard time to figure out how to write with cache, but after reading BFS and block_cache codebase, it can be done easily with memcpy for copying data to cache and block_cache_sync for flushing to disk.
This is the main goal in the previous 2 weeks. I modified some parts of the source, specially I renamed BPlusTree to BTree, because BtrFS uses a variant of BTree and it should not have links between leaves to prevent copy-on-write the whole tree. I added new structures BNode and BPath. The BNode contain a cache for node (btrfs_stream), so that it can do r/w easily instead of doing directly on disk and the BPath is for manipulating tree. You can read more details in my commit history1.
I started to look into linux code base, but it is still too complicated for me. Therefore I asked for help in BtrFS’s IRC (freenode #btrfs) and mailing list2. There is a guy in IRC who helped about the transactional and journal concept. BtrFS is based on Copy-On-Write (COW), so it does “logging” differ from other filesystems that write log directly to disk. There are 4 roots backup (include the current root) in BtrFS superblock, with each successful transaction the oldest root will be replaced, so whenever there is a corruption in a system, it just changed the current root to the previous root. In the mailing list, I received a recommendation that I should read btrfs-progs4 codes instead of BtrFS in linux kernel. btrfs-progs is a collection of userland tools, it has codes similar to main BtrFS but less complexity and smaller so that very easy to read.
I had a small conversation with tqh, he helped me with locking technique in Haiku, testing correctness and gave me some helpful documents. About locking, this is the hard concept, I just know about basic stuff that I already learnt at school. I think I will try to implement with no locks first and test to see what will happen.
Figured out some additional works, they are merging nodes, handling transactions and allocating blocks…
This week works
I continue do things as planned: Splitting node. Also, I will try to do the additional work in between weeks.
Thanks for reading, see again next weeks!
- [GSoC 2017] Porting Swift to Haiku - Week #9 / #10
- Recovering from RMLL 2017
- [gsoc_2017] tcp optimization report 5
- [GSoC 2017] Calendar Application: Weekly Report 6
- Haiku monthly activity report - 07/2017
- [GSoC 2017 - BTRFS write support] Week #9 #10 #11 (Second coding period)
- [GSoC 2017] Preferences GUI Refactoring - Weekly Report 5
- [GSoC 2017] Porting Swift to Haiku - Week #8
- [GSoC 2017] Calendar Application: Weekly Report 5