General Haiku Discussion

Here you can talk about anything relating to Haiku.

ARM support question

Forum thread started by Superhyper on Tue, 2009-07-07 19:27

Hello fellow Haikuers (Haikuites?),

I'm going to be purchasing the new Touch Book by Always Innovating (assuming they actually ship the thing like they say they will) this month. It is my understanding that this netbook/tablet will be powered by a Beagleboard-based system running a TI OMAP 5430 ARM chip, and i'm curious if anyone here has done any work with running Haiku on ARM chips. I know in the past there was some limited discussion of this on the mailing lists, but it's been awhile since i've heard anything. If any of you know anything about it or could point me in the right direction to look, i'd be much obliged.

Some noob questions about Haiku

Forum thread started by admin on Sun, 2009-06-28 16:00

Hi!!!

This operating system looks nice but i have some questions:

it will support multiprocessors, SMT and dual/quad core cpu's?

It will support SSE1,2,3,4... and 64bytes?

What compiler are you using to compile the Haiku? the weird GNU CC, PCC, Microsoft COmpiler, Intel compiler or a custom made compiler?

What open gl version haiku will have? OGL 2, 2.1, 3, 3.1, 1.5????

Thanks for help and sorry for my noobish english!!!

Regards

smart pointers

Forum thread started by apprentice on Tue, 2009-06-23 09:52

Why not use smart pointers instead of delete in Haiku? It should prevent all memory leaks, dangling pointers and object ownership problems. When the last reference to an object goes out of scope the object would be deleted automatically.

If the standard C++ auto_ptr isn't enough there is always Loki and Boostlib.

What makes BeOS so special today?

Forum thread started by Interested on Tue, 2009-06-23 07:46

Of course, Haiku is based on BeOS R5. However, I believe there need to be more exposure of knowledge about BeOS to the public to understand what Haiku is. That means we need to have a very good understanding on BeOS itself.

Anyway, what makes BeOS (R5) so special compare to Windows, Linux, or Apple? After all these years of halt of development of BeOS, are there any very unique feature that BeOS has compare to other operating system?

Is it true that BeOS is very Unix-like?

I still remember my old relative being sad about BeOS becoming obsolete. Still today. :(

Is it possible to reverse engineer BeOS to add into Haiku?

Forum thread started by Interested on Tue, 2009-06-23 07:41

There's WINE project that is going very smoothly.

I don't see any project that is trying to reverse-engineer BeOS R5. Of course, there aren't many infos circulating that often on Haiku these days.

Forgive me if I'm wrong but I hope Haiku could make use of reverse-engineering efforts to make Haiku complete.

BeOS is several years more advanced than Microsoft OSes at that time. Too bad that it is dead.

Hi. Suported my HW

Forum thread started by lukves on Fri, 2009-06-19 15:39

Hi. i am long time fan of Haiku and BeOS. My first experiance with BeOS was in 2000year when i run BeOS Personal Edition from MSDOS partition. Its very interest feel. Now i have one computer with dual core intel pentium with 9800GT nvidia card and i have a second PowerMac G4 400Mhz. I want test Haiku but CD ISO images are not released yet. I want know that my two PCs are compatible or will be compatible with Haiku. I test Zeta x86 on my intel and its run. and how will be suported power arch in Haiku i dont now...

Is it possible to use MIT-licensed code in "public domain" projects?

Forum thread started by latte on Sun, 2009-05-31 21:14

Hi -
I have a license question relating to the MIT license.
The license says that "without limitation" it is possible to "use, copy, modify.... and sublicense" code released under it, "subject to the following conditions:

"The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be included in all copies or substantial portions of the Software."

So, what I was wondering is - does that mean that it is possible to use MIT-licensed code in a "public domain" project, and to "sublicense" (relicense) that code as "public domain"?

( I'm not specifically thinking of Haiku code here, but MIT-licensed code in general, so I apologise if this is a bit off-topic. )

I've seen a few MIT-licensed projects elsewhere, and what I was thinking of doing is as follows. Let's say I create a public-domain app called "foo", and include some code from the MIT-licensed "bar" project. I would do that as follows -

"Acknowledgements - Code in the foo project is released to the public domain. The foo project would not have been possible without the use of code from the bar project.

The bar project is licensed under the MIT license.
( MIT License text here..... ) "

( Btw, I'm in New Zealand, which may have a somewhat different approach (more relaxed) to "public domain" apps than other countries do. )

So, I was wondering - is that kind of scenario acceptable or legitimate? It does seem to meet the requirements of the MIT license, but it's good to have comments from others.... :)
Many thanks in advance -
- latte

Syndicate content